A11315. Recovering a Small String

Nikita had a word consisting of exactly $3$ lowercase Latin letters. The letters in the Latin alphabet are numbered from $1$ to $26$ , where the letter "a" has the index $1$ , and the letter "z" has the index $26$ .

He encoded this word as the sum of the positions of all the characters in the alphabet. For example, the word "cat" he would encode as the integer $3 + 1 + 20 = 24$ , because the letter "c" has the index $3$ in the alphabet, the letter "a" has the index $1$ , and the letter "t" has the index $20$ .

However, this encoding turned out to be ambiguous! For example, when encoding the word "ava", the integer $1 + 22 + 1 = 24$ is also obtained.

Determine the lexicographically smallest word of $3$ letters that could have been encoded.

A string $a$ is lexicographically smaller than a string $b$ if and only if one of the following holds:

- $a$ is a prefix of $b$ , but $a \ne b$ ;
- in the first position where $a$ and $b$ differ, the string $a$ has a letter that appears earlier in the alphabet than the corresponding letter in $b$ .

The first line of the input contains a single integer $t$ ( $1 \le t \le 100$ ) — the number of test cases in the test.

This is followed by the descriptions of the test cases.

The first and only line of each test case contains an integer $n$ ( $3 \le n \le 78$ ) — the encoded word.

For each test case, output the lexicographically smallest three-letter word that could have been encoded on a separate line.